Which Tripod
About the best thing that I have done so far regards buying a Tripod is not to buy one. I would have got it so wrong!! I had totally underestimated the weight of the new lenses, the effect that a strong wind can have on a tripod, and the height that is required when you are 6ft 4″.
To continue the confession – I always sort of had tripods down as a posers device, and while I still have a huge issue with the whole ‘image’ of setting up to take a proper photograph, the need to prepare thoroughly has won and I now need to get my mind around a ‘proper’ tripod.
My research to date has boiled down to these key features in my view:
Stability – This has to be the most important factor, especially with the weight of the zoom lens.
Quality construction – I reckon as few plastic parts as possible is best, so need to look for metals such as aluminum, carbon fiber and titanium alloy.
Quick Release – Although the majority of photographs taken with the tripod will be planned, the need exists for speed of release from the mounting plate, and possibly even the option to have mutiple plates for different cameras.
Camera positioned horizontally and vertically
Height – High enough for comfortable viewing so you don’t have to bend over. The extended centre pole needs to be strong enough as well, as with the ones I have looked at to date when fully extended the stability suffers
Tripod heads – the popular method seems to be permanent three-way pan tilt heads, but ball heads are smaller, lighter and more expensive than pan-tilt heads but are faster and easier to use.
Clamps levers or flip-locks – Basically setting up and adjusting the tripod legs has to be easy and quick, especially if you are going to be taking shots outdoors in the cold with gloves on.
Bubble level – I hadn’t even thought about the need for this until I started straightening a lot of my photos in Photoshop.
I suppose it would be easy enough to say “just buy the most expensive one you can afford”, but as I wont be travelling that much with it weight isn’t a huge issue so I don’t need to pay for lightness. I don’t anticipate taking too many shots up mountains, so spikes at the bottom of the tripod legs may be somewhat excessive as well.
It goes without saying that I will need a full size tripod but the question is which one and how much?
And this is where the internet becomes overwhelming! A quick search on ‘professional tripods’ threw up about 1,630,000 entries. The equivalent of shopping in a mega store for music, sounds a good idea but I always end up getting agitated at how much there is to look at and then start feeling threatened and leave without looking at anything!
The Zhumell Professional Tripod TRIWDF4 looks pretty good, and reasonably priced. The Induro range seems very good as well? I could go on, but what I really need is help out of this maize!!! So, what do you use, what would you like to use, what do you suggest I get?
As ever, cheers!
Related posts:
- What I Want From a DSLR Matthew – Before I can really help you, you...
- Do You? Believe it or not I plan most posts –...
- Camera Equipment I still haven’t worked out which camera bag I...
- DSLR – Workflow, The End of the Journey , or just the beginning? The camera is great, the lens is doing a...
- 40 Digital Photography Techniques “Digital Photography has truly reached the masses, and with...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Right now I use a Manfrotto tripod, which was good at the time I bought it. Now I find it a bit too fussy. I’m looking at one a friend got, and it seems very nice. I will let you know what it is soon.
I am sure that my mate used the exact same phrase to describe his first wife before he divorced her
Hmm… sounds like my relationship with my tripod. I might be breaking one of commandments but I really like what my friend has
I saw a past episode of Layers TV which had a product review of a Giottos tripod/ I ended up getting the tripod and ball head that were featured. Just got them tonight – definitely worth the bucks – professional, sturdy, construction. I was tired of buying cheaper models that I ended up not using for various reasons.
http://www.layersmagazine.com/layerstv-episode8.html
Received by email from Dorothy – cheers
I’ve got a cheaper model right now. It does OK for what I am using it for right now. It has a friction head, which is good for the DSLR, but not so good for the camcorder. It jerks when you pan. Something to think about…
Aha the tripod post!
I was told by my local photo shop guy not to buy the cheap ones he had in stock and to get a Giottos setup off the net. Go figure, an honest man! Haven’t purchased yet but would follow that advice as he seemed to know what he was on about.
I also need a Rocket Blower as I have dust on my sensor and it is extremely upsetting. Grrr.
By the way I heartily endorse the Gorillapod:
http://www.joby.com/
Super piece of kit.
[quote comment="20963"]By the way I heartily endorse the Gorillapod:
http://www.joby.com/
Super piece of kit.[/quote]
Sands bought me one of these for the T7 for my birthday
The Giottos is coming up a few times now and looks a very serious bit of kit!!!
@Wayne – I will continue to use my ‘cheap’ Sony tripod for the camcorder, works a treat!
Am liking this one as a good deal?
This one looks pretty cool, and useful for Macro, but I would want a ball head as well which would push the cost up.
I don’t know… Seems like the ball head would be a little overkill for a pro/am and kind of a pain to get lined up and even all the time. ? Maybe? Then again, I’ve never used one.
I am generally in favour of the Manfrotto range. I was able to see them locally and have bought two locally. My perception is that the Giotto range is also worth considering, but they weren’t available locally the last time I was in the market.
As far as heads are concerned, I have a friction-damped video head on one Manfrotto and a ball head on the other one. Additional quick release plates are available. (I’m sure I bought one, but I can’t for the life of me find it!)
Given the long lens you bought, you might want to be careful and check that the combined weight of the body and lens will be supported by your proposed combination of tripod and head. I notice that Manfrotto have a new “Tripod Configurator” linked from their home page. Whether you end up going with Manfrotto or not, it might repay you to run through it to get a feel for the sort of spec you should be looking at.
Regarding Mac’s opening comment about having come to find his Manfrotto “too fussy”, be aware that they have various different designs available. Although both of mine were bought within six to twelve months of each other and I spent approximately the same amount each time, the leg locking mechanism is different for each one. I have a vague memory of coming to find the locking mechanism irritating on the first one. I have no real problems with the second one. Except, perhaps, that I’d like it to be able to go a bit higher.
Since my “main” tripod – the one I use when I go off out with the SLR – has the ball head on it, a built-in spirit level (aka Bubble level) is irrelevant. There’s no great point in levelling the tripod then the ball head could easily be set way off level. I will generally raise the tripod so that the centre column is approximately straight. The degree of straightness is only really relevant if I plan to shoot a set of overlapping shots that I’m going to try to “stitch” together to make a long panoramic shot. Even then, with the “simple” ball head, it’s debatable whether it’s worth while.
I use a little levelling accessory similar to this which slides on and off the flash hot shoe. (NB If I shoot without removing the level, my Canon Eos 350D records in the EXIF information that flash was used, thinking that a “dumb” flash was in the hot-shoe.) Using this, I’m straightening the camera and at the end of the day, that’s what’s important.
Another consideration for your tripod is how low can it go? You might occasionally want to shoot at or near ground level. Not all tripods will allow you to go down to ground level.
Final thought for you for now… Try to make sure that the tripod you end up going for has independent leg mechanisms. My first couple of tripods, many years ago now, had interlinked legs. You really want to have legs which can be set to different angles, to suit varying shooting circumstances. (I’m not referring to being able to extend each leg to a different length.)
@Chris – When did you get a new lens, and what is it???
I don’t use a tripod, it doesn’t suit my style of photography. However the Manfrotto range is where I’d look. It’s worth considering as an option, a bean bag which can let you make use of any stable object as a base for your camera.
As for me, unlike you, I still use film as a medium, not just for the look but how could I possibly find anything to rival my Contax/Zeiss SLR and rangefinder kit.
A friend of mine ordered this one:
http://www.amvona.com/?page=shop/flypage&view=1&product_id=1838
I really like the trigger like, quick ball release handle. Also it is tall. Fully extended puts the camera a few inches above my 6′3″ hight. The construction is very sturdy with 3 level indicators, 2 on the head and one on the tripod itself. It’s really easy to extend, and fold back. One draw back to it is that it’s pretty heavy, but at $60 + shipping, is not a bad deal, since I can use the “trigger” head on my manfrotto tripod.
@Mac – where did you see the $60 price? It certainly seems an option, but I see it costing $199
@wayne – i recently picked up a Sigma 135-400mm and a Sigma 10-20mm and I am very happy with them so far!
The 135-400mm is the one that has made me think more about the need for a sturdy tripod, and some visits to the gym to build up my arms!!!!
[quote comment="21033"]As for me, unlike you, I still use film as a medium, not just for the look but how could I possibly find anything to rival my Contax/Zeiss SLR and rangefinder kit.[/quote]
I should dig out my SLR and take some comparative photographs out of interest!
@Gary – thanks! Seems a short answer for such great advice, but all your points are really helpful – as are all the comments on this subject!!!
I am slowly going mad searching through all the options. I don’t know if there is a half decent camera shop near here, but ideally I want to check out few options ‘in the flesh’. There is one small store in the Mall that I know sells some tripods but I will be amazed if they are high quality!
@Chris – There is a little secret to it. The company has an ebay store here: http://stores.ebay.com/amvona-com
They have their regular stuff for normal sale, but they also auction off some things as well.
If you go to that store, then on the left you will see a list of the products… click on tripods and monopods, then pick any tripod….. scroll down the list of specs….. almost at the bottom they will have a list of items that are on auction. That’s were picked up mine for 60 + shipping.
That is a great shout thanks, am bidding on one already
> ideally I want to check out few options ‘in the flesh’
If you have any more trips back to the UK or over to the US coming up soon, perhaps you could make appropriate detours to see some of the bigger camera stores at that time and view the tripods in the flesh. And then order by mail order once you return home, to save trying to lug an awkward, heavy tripod onto a plane?
Alternatively, instead of a local camera store, maybe there are local camera clubs? They’re not everybody’s scene, but might give you exposure to some tripods and their owners opinions of them.
No trips planned, nor do I want to take any!
Seems to me like you guys all have a number of tripods so I am going to try and get the one that Mac got as he rates it and we have similar requirements, and then I will see how I get on with that one and when I get a chance try a few others for size.
At the fourth attempt ……… success!!!
First bid I lost at $76, the second at $86 and the third at $96 so I was really pleased to win the bid this evening at $76. Add the $80 to ship via UPS and that is not a bad price for a brand new tripod that retails at $425.
3-5 days and it should be here.
Funnily though I spoke with my parents earlier and they are off to watch the Shuttle launch on Thursday and video it and were thinking of getting a tripod!!!!
@Chris
That seems like a real bargain. Hopefully it won’t end up like your iphone by incurring import tax, I bought a motor drive on ebay for my Contax camera from a guy in the usa. He put it’s worth as $100 on the package though I paid only about $40. When it arrived via UPS I had to pay for the import tax based on his valuation plus a collection fee. In the end it cost me twice as much as I paid for it. Since then I’ve never bought anything from the states.
It should be fine as the actual amount that I paid was less than the import threshold.
The iPhone is the only thing that has been ‘caught’ in the 6 years we have been here, but I am a lot more jittery now when I order stuff.
Hope you don’t mind me going off topic here, but seeing as all the camera crew are following this thread wanted to ask a question. I’d dearly love a digital SLR, finding my point and shoot too limiting now. However, I am new to all the kit so looking for advice. Budget wise it would have to be lower end around the £350-£400 price range. Had a look at a Canon EOS 350D for £325 last weekend. Pretty sure i have heard good things about some of the Canon range.
Welcome any advice!
I ventured into the DSLR world not so long ago, with a Nikon D40. Superb camera, fantastic images.
Be warned – addictive, expensive hobby. Cases, lenses, flashes, filters, memory cards, software – yes even tripods!
I would advise on doing a lot of research. Because once you get into a brand, and get accessories and lenses, it’s hard to switch. It’s all preference. Some are Nikon fans some Canon, and there are others. But all offer one thing, all proprietary. Personally I have the Canon and I like Canon. Knock on wood, never had any problems with it yet. Nikons on the other hand are a different story. That is why when I was making my choice, this bad experience weighted in favor of Canon. I really like my 400D or Canon Digital Rebel XTi. I find it easy to work with, and a lot of fun. Right now it fits my needs perfectly. Chris will say the same thing about his Nikon D80 (I think that’s what he has). They are both very similar cameras. So choose, but choose wisely.
You are not totally locked in to a manufacturer, certainly in terms of lenses. Sigma and Tamron, for example, make great lenses that will happily mount on most cameras. Just check and make sure your particular autofocus system is compatible.
But generally speaking accessories work best with each other if they come from one source.
Oh and don’t listen to the Canon fanboys. They don’t know what they are on about. Nikon all the way.
http://www.dpreview.com and the forums there are probably the best places for reviews and advice, as always forum posts to be taken with a pinch of salt.
And I like Ken Rockwell for no-nonsense reviews and advice. http://www.kenrockwell.com/
He has a high opinion of himself and is unpopular in some quarters but his site has been very useful for me.
Oh and definitely get a proper flash at some point. It makes a HUGE difference in the quality of your shots, especially indoor shooting. The rest of you guys think the same?
I have a D80. I blogged a lot about the selection at the time (search on DSLR) and went with Nikon in the end purely because I preferred them. Within the relevant price ranges I found that each brand was pretty much the same so it came down to personal choice.
What I would say though is that unlike a P&S a DSLR is just the start, so be patient. By that I mean avoid the bundled deals however attractive they look as they will be shipping out of date and not particularly useful lenses.
In my experience you are going to add lenses as you go, so my theory was (and is) buy the best body that you can afford as this will stay with you for a long time. Lets be honest here a good DSLR body is going to be good enough for years with new lenses added and the software that is available today.
So what I did was buy the D80 and a pretty basic lens and used that until I was comfortable with that and had worked out what lenses I wanted.
Funnily enough I am hoping top post later on the subject of camera equipment!!!
@Dunks – Just after Chris bought his his Nikon, I had to try the Canon. I’m by all means no Canon fanboy, but I have heard nothing but good things about the Rebel XT/XTi series. This being my first DSLR I wanted quality, but within a decent price range.
That being said, I like the camera. I like using it and it didn’t break my bank!
I was only joking. The whole fanboy thing amuses me!
We have Canon to thank for creating the entry-level DSLR market by releasing the Rebel in the first place, and that is something.
I simply prefer Nikons for probably ill-defined reasons. One is heft and build-quality – the D40 seems built like a tank whereas the equivalent Canon at the time was much more plastic-y.
Plus I have used Nikons for some time without issues, and several Fujis, Sonys and Canons (compacts) have gone wonky on me.
No problems!
I didn’t know there was a Canon/Nikon rivalry! Should have known, though…
Oh it’s a bitter forum-based war that’s been going forever! It is highly entertaining…check any photo site.
You don’t need geopolitics for a good scrap. Just put two photographers who use different brands in a room together and stand back.
@John … I have to disagree, about being locked in. Yes there are 3rd party companies that make lenses for all the brands of cameras out there, but once you pick your poison be it Nikon Canon etc, the lenses from these cameras are not interchangeable. So essentially you are locked in to the body manufacturer.
Nikon… bah humbug!!!
I’m going to let you have it in the camera equipment post!
But yes, once you have chosen the light (Nikon) or dark (Canon) side of the force (photography) you are committed, so a choice to be made carefully.
Having said that most sensible photographers say that it doesn’t really matter what you use, just get out there and shoot!
@John
This time I will whole heartedly agree with you. It’s not the equipment that takes good pictures.
Also isn’t Darth Vader indefinitely cooler looking than his wussy kid?? Join the Dark Side…. at least it’s more fun
I think through all the movies the dark side was more powerful too…
At least they had a lot cooler effects. 
My advice would be to go with the camera with the best lenses. In my opinion, Zeiss is the best. They make adaptors for both Canon and Nikon so check them ouit
[quote comment="21929"]Oh and definitely get a proper flash at some point. It makes a HUGE difference in the quality of your shots, especially indoor shooting. The rest of you guys think the same?[/quote]
I’m not a fan of flash photography John though it is a useful accessory for those snapshot moments. I’ve always gone for fast lenses and high speed films for low light photography. Of course with you digital guys, the iso settings allow you to take pictures in the dark! I’d recommend a prime lens of f1.4. The added benefit of being able to create an extremely shallow depth of field is more than a good excuse for the price of one of these beauties.
Fill and bounce flash can make a beautiful photo, especially portraits where there are several people. I by no means claim to be a professional, but I think a better flash unit has made an enormous difference to my indoor shots.
An example – my baby son, with no flash the shot is quite yellow regardless of white balance and quite difficult to get a decent photo at lower shutter speeds, as he tends to wave his arms around quite a bit there was a lot of motion blur. With the Speedlight bounced off the ceiling his complexion was perfect and I could use a much higher shutter speed to “freeze” the little wriggler.
For shooting people in almost any circumstances you can avoid a lot of post-processing (most of which is voodoo to me) by using a good flash. Having said that, I use Nikon Capture NX which makes it a breeze to adjust exposure.
I would love a decent prime lens for my D40 but there isn’t one that comes with a built-in autofocus motor which is what I need…and to note for Dunks above there is no depth-of-field preview on the D40 which is a bummer and will probably make me upgrade at some point.
I’ve already pointed this site out to Chris, but let me mention it for anyone else who is either interested in learning more about the use of small portable flash gear – or doubts its value. (Lurk here for a while and then see if you can still say that flash is not a worthy tool for creative/controlled/enhanced photography!
)
Strobist
I’m not “into” flash photography just now (main interest is landscape type work), but if/when I do decide to get into it, this is the place I’ll start! I’ve been lurking for, I think, about a year and a half.
I will second that site Gary – has been really helpful.
In reality I think you are looking at Canon or Nikon for your DSLR.
I have that one bookmarked too.
Chris is right. While Pentax, Olympus, Sony and others make great DSLRs too I am sure, it is really between Nikon and Canon.
For sensible peeps who bought a Nikon, this is one of the best sites to go to also:
http://www.bythom.com/nikon.htm
He has some great ebooks available for particular models of Nikon DSLR (including the D80).
I’ve finally got some time to comment on some of phase two of this thread.
@Chris #32
> avoid the bundled deals however attractive they look as they will be shipping
> out of date and not particularly useful lenses.
Sorry, but I disagree. Looking at the Canon EOS 400, which has replaced the EOS 350d I bought in May 2006, it looks (according to the Jessops site) as if it still comes with the same lens.
This is not an out of date lens. Neither is it a “not particularly useful lens”. I would argue that the 18-55mm range is a reasonably useful range, especially for a beginner to (D)SLRs. It’s also pretty compact.
What’s it’s not is high quality (optically). I was warned about this before I bought, but decided to proceed. For, oh I don’t know, maybe the first ten months it was my only lens and I was generally happy with it (as far as it went, range-wise). It was only after I bought my Sigma 10-20 lens that I began to realise that, optically, it produced slightly “soft” images in comparison. But you have to spend a lot more to get the higher optical quality lenses.
Dunks – in case my comments about the quality have put you off, take a look at any of the images in these three pages, where virtually everything is shot with the standard kit lens, in three quite different situations.
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum
Sony Bravia advert
Dunure Castle
Some other dealers put together their own bundles with different lenses.
I can’t speak for the Nikon range, but I don’t see them being any different.
However, apart from that, I think I pretty much agree with the rest of you comment.
@John #30
> Oh and don’t listen to the Canon fanboys. They don’t know what they are on about.
> Nikon all the way.
Saith the Nikon fan-boy! I bet you come from Edinburgh too!
Seriously though, I’m a long term Canon user. If I was starting over again I would consider Nikon as the first alternative to Canon. There are quite a lot of similarities between the two ranges. They tend to try to leap-frog each other when they release new models.
@John #43
> and to note for Dunks above there is no depth-of-field preview on the D40
> which is a bummer and will probably make me upgrade at some point.
I’ve had five SLRs over the years. I’ve tinkered with the DOF preview on a number of occasions, but never once been able to use it properly. By the time I use the DOF preview, the viewfinder’s always too dark to be able to discern whether what I want to be in focus is actually in focus or not, and vice versa.
Are you telling me that you actually, genuinely get benefit from it? (Or is it just that you know it’s missing from the camera you currently have and would like to try it because of what you’ve read?) Inquiring minds wish to know!
Crikey! Disparage my choice of camera if you must, but I draw the line at being accused of being a Scot!
I’m English, although mother hails from South Africa originally. At one point back in the medieval day the family ruled over Kent…
Anyway, back to cameras.
Gary, I used to use DOF on my old Pentax film SLR, with mixed success. It is a noted missing feature on the D40, and apparently works quite well on the D80 (Chris?).
But I have to say after reading Understanding Exposure I have determined the best way to judge DOF is to take LOTS OF PICTURES.
Oh! Not even Edinburgh?
> But I have to say after reading Understanding Exposure I have determined the best way
> to judge DOF is to take LOTS OF PICTURES.
No arguments there!!
I don’t understand the argument over depth of field preview. As with a film SLR it is not possible to be sure as to what is or is not in focus other than the subject. The principle is that if you want to isolate a subject, use a large aperture otherwise go for a high shutter speed.
As to the Canon/ Nikon thing, there is more to life than that. Think medium format or even large format if your imaginations can run past the snapper type photography. I’d go there if I could afford it. Maybe I’ll save up, I’d love a Contax 645
I don’t think there’s an argument…?
Canon vs Nikon is taken very seriously by some, but nobody here so far.
And I’m mildly offended at the “snapper type photography” comment, and the imagination thing. It makes you sound pretty arrogant and a little silly.
Why would I lug a Contax about, deal with film, digital backs, hard-to-find lenses, at a cost that is difficult to justify in the face of today’s top-end DSLRs offering similar if not equal performance and vastly superior convenience? Plus do they even make it anymore?
I’d say it is taken very seriously by most Canon & Nikon users. Look at the posts here!You guys are slagging each other off about a brand of camera. All of this fan boy stuff is a bit pathetic in the face of what photography is about; results
So far there is none of fanboyism here what so ever. If there are little snickers at each other it’s most for fun. I would say that no one here cares if it’s canon or nikon or contax. Great equipment does not make a good photographer. So sit back relax and enjoy the comments.
I speak for myself, but I would imagine none here are professional photographers. We just enjoy taking pictures, and enjoy reading each others comments. If it wasn’t so, this thread wouldn’t have so many of those. Personally I would love to see your photos Jeremy, is there anywhere on the net I could find them? Mine can be found at my flickr account and here Smugmug account . I would not consider these as mere “snappers”.
@Gary
My comment regards the ‘bundles’ was based on my (limited) experience when I was looking around for the D80. At the time I was getting tempted by the offers that included things like 3 lenses, 2 tripods, bag etc. I came to the conclusion that while having all that in one ‘hit’ may be attractive it would be a short term approach and I should take the process slower and buy individual items at as high a quality as I could afford over a period of time.
@John
My DOF experience is limited, but I have had no issues with the D80 at all
[quote comment="22132"]
And I’m mildly offended at the “snapper type photography” comment, and the imagination thing. It makes you sound pretty arrogant and a little silly.[/quote]
Didn’t read it like that myself
I felt it was a generic observation about making the shift and maybe not looking at this as a brand debate
[quote comment="22132"]Why would I lug a Contax about, deal with film, digital backs, hard-to-find lenses, at a cost that is difficult to justify in the face of today’s top-end DSLRs offering similar if not equal performance and vastly superior convenience? Plus do they even make it anymore?[/quote]
Now that is easy – because he can and because he enjoys it and it gives him photographic satisfaction – which is what it is all about!!! Is why I ride a Harley Davidson and not a sports bike for example.
[quote comment="22141"]I’d say it is taken very seriously by most Canon & Nikon users. Look at the posts here!You guys are slagging each other off about a brand of camera. All of this fan boy stuff is a bit pathetic in the face of what photography is about; results[/quote]
I think you are right in general but not here! Canon or Nikon – it really doesn’t matter. No different than a BMW or a Mercedes. Both great cars without doubt, but some people prefer one to another. Wouldn’t say no to either of them would you really?! I haven’t heard any complaints from either Canon or Nikon users, and the general view seems to be to buy what you feel comfortable with within your price range. That a Canon or Nikon will server you equally well, and that it is all TOTALLY irrelevant if you don’t get out and use the bloody thing!!!
@Mac
@ everyone
I apologize if any of my comments here seem offensive. They were never meant that way, I was trying to play the advocate. I had the impression that there was a ‘mine’s better than yours’ argument going on. That’s the thing about the web, we don’t hear the tone of voice and can sometimes take comments the wrong way. It seems that my comments fell foul also.
I for one haven’t taken any offense, and have enjoyed this thread immensly. Thanks to all for that – I much prefer this level of debate and discussion to the ‘awesome’ ‘cool’ ‘great post’ crap that fills many a blog these days
The question is have we helped Dunks who doesn’t seem to have got a word in since he asked the initial question
To be honest I took cover behind the sofa once this thread picked up momentum, didn’t mean to open a can of worms!!
No, I have to agree with Chris, I enjoy the in depth level of debate and was aware there are some keen and experienced folks following the blog so was sure I would receive good advice. To see such passion is great.
I will be doing a lot of research based on your comments and having a look at the URL’s suggested. It does seem as if it is a choice between Nikon and Canon and once I have a shortlist may come down to price/availability and ‘preference’ when I actually get my hands on them.
Will keep people posted!
Peace, love and xmas spirit to you all!
@Jeremy, @Chris et al – I did say I was “mildly” offended. I didn’t lose any sleep! But like Mac, I think my photos are more than snaps, even if I don’t have hundreds up on flickr or my own gallery and they are taken with an “entry-level” DSLR. The few really good shots I have so far keep me at it.
It can be difficult to take note of tone, even with smileys etc, so no apology necessary for me. Actually your post prompted me to read up on medium and large format cameras and some of the photos are truly amazing. But wow at what cost? The new systems are coming in at $35,000 + for a body and digital back!
There has been some gentle Nikon/Canon ribbing going. The point I think to have been made was that the two major DSLR brands are Nikon and Canon and that Dunks would not go wrong with either’s offerings.
I have come up against people who thought equipment was everything, spent a fortune and then lorded it up. Fact was, their photos were terrible, they never got out of P or “the green setting” (an actual quote) and didn’t have a clue what DOF even meant. They could have got the same shots with a high-end P&S, perhaps even better as they would have been actually taking photos instead of pretending to twiddle with their DSLR settings.
Now one comment HAS offended me. BMWs and Mercedes are awful cars. Now, Audi, like mine, that is a quality vehicle!
I’m glad that’s sorted out. It’s funny, You guys use DSLRs and drive quality German cars,I still use film and drive a Land-Rover Defender
@John
Damn I nearly wrote BMW and Audi as I have owned both (328i and A6). I really like the look of the R8
@Jeremy
Not me sir – I drive a 12 year old Jeep these days!!!!
This great discussion is going on while I’m sleeping, and really it’s all Dunks fault!!
Daring to ask what camera to get. Funny thing is like John I started reading up on those cameras. I must say, wow. Prices are really prohibitive for me, so I’m sticking to my canon xti for now. Maybe eventually, when I’m good enough… at this point my dslr fits my needs and skill. Jeremy seems a lot more of a professional (probably is!!!), so my appeal goes out to him. I would really love to see your photos Jeremy.
German cars…. ha…. I drive an old GMC Jimmy, gas guzzling SUV.
@ Mac
I’m not a professional photographer, just a keen eyed amateur. I have no website or online photos other than a few on myspace etc. As I said to Chris on another thread, there are the photos I did for a cd here, (click on the Gallery link)
http://www.john-herring.com/
I have to admit to a weakness for Zeiss lenses. Their colour and contrast rendition is legendary, as is the ‘bokeh’ (the term used to describe the way out of focus objects appear) I’ve not seen anything to equal the sheer beauty they produce. They now produce a range to fit Nikon cameras, so if I were to go for a dslr that’s where I’d go. However to muddy the waters, it seems that Canon lead the way with their full frame sensors. I’ll just stick to film.
The Defender is the last true bastion of British automotive greatness. If it isn’t broken, why try and fix it? Super cars and if I had a genuine need for an offroader and could afford to have more than one car, safe to say one would be parked outside with designer mud splashes all up it. A friend had a souped up V8-powered 110 designed for the Paris-Dakar and it was most amusing to overtake and out-accelerate Porsches and Ferraris in it.
The old 328i was a classic. The new A6 is very good, the old one a bit wonky. Now we are four in the family I am looking to go bigger, am currently lusting after either a Range Rover Sport or A6 Allroad. A full-on large format photo setup would almost be the same price!!
Dunks, have you chosen a camera yet man!
@John, If it isn’t broken, why try and fix it? As a lover of all things Land Rovers, I’ve just got to stop you there.
I’ve owned 3 or 4 Series IIa and a Range Rover Classic. (Never could get my favorite, the Defender. In the states they are just too expensive!) Anyway, if one thing is realized in the Rover community is if it’s not leaking oil, it’s empty! I finally had to give up my girls, as I could no longer work on them myself. And there was ALWAYS something to fix! 
I even worked for a time at Bearmach in Cardiff, Swansea and Swindon. Mostly at the Cardiff location, though, as it was the corporate headquarters. Still, even after all that, if I was offered a Series again, I would take it in a heartbeat.
@Jeremy, thank you for the glimpse of your skill. I like it. Especially I like the bottom right hand corner shot, the reflection in the guitar. Thanks
It’s interesting how this thread started from tripod, traversed through cameras and now it’s ending up with cars…. I bet Dunks will have a tripod, camera, and a nice land rover (FORD!!!!!!!) by the end of it.
@Wayne – I was speaking philosophically, as a past owner of two different generations of Range Rover with more in the family and with friends, I am only too well aware of their failings!!
I have never owned a Defender either but friends have and they are pretty solid as far as I am aware. Agricultural, but solid!
I was thinking the same as you Mac. This thread has branched off in a few directions. However that is the beauty of a forum.
Regarding my Defender, it is the only time I’ve bought a vehicle from new. Apart from replacing a faulty relay, and the contacts in the starter solenoid (both of which I did myself) oh and one tyre, it has run faultlessly for 8 years). I love it:-)
@ Mac I’m glad you like the photos. Reflections have always been something I like to use
I had a Range Rover once
4.6 HSE which I loved, would get another one in a flash if I could justify spending money on a vehicle – we do less than 250km a month typically!!!!
[...] love Boxing Day in Spain – everything is back to Normal, which means that my tripod has arrived. In the end I went for the Professional Camera Tripod Kit Ball Grip Head -828BL and my [...]
Gotta love Boxing Day in Spain – everything is back to Normal, which means that my tripod has arrived. In the end I went for the
Professional Camera Tripod Kit Ball Grip Head -828BL and my intial impressions are:
Am really looking forward to getting out and using it!
Can I bring it back to tripods?
Now that I’ve gone medium-format, I’d like to get one. Speed of use is not an issue, stability is paramount.
Gitzo and Manfrotto have so many models I’m bewildered. Need help
[quote comment=""]Can I bring it back to tripods?
Now that I’ve gone medium-format, I’d like to get one. Speed of use is not an issue, stability is paramount.
Gitzo and Manfrotto have so many models I’m bewildered. Need help[/quote]
All I can say is that I am more than happy with my Amnova
I recently got a new carbon fiber tripod from this Ebay Store. It’s base, meaning no head, but that’s what I’ve been looking for. It expands to about 45″ in hight and folds down to 19″ and will support upto 17lbs. Very light and good solid construction. This is going to be my traveling tripod. I looked at some of the name brands on the internet and the carbon fiber tripods are ridiculously expensive. So this one at $130 CDN including shipping, is not a bad deal.
Leave your response!
Additional comments powered by BackType
blip.tv
Recommended
Latest Twitpic
Phlogs
Recent Comments
Add Me As A Friend
Clients Sites
Personal Stuff
Worth A Look
Search By Tag
Categories
Recent Posts
Most Commented
Most Viewed